Showing posts with label Dr. Julie Griffith San Rafael. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Dr. Julie Griffith San Rafael. Show all posts

Here's What You Can Do With Your Agreement


At her request, I was considering signing a NonDisparagement Agreement with Dr. Griffith and stated that I would not initiate any disparaging remarks and that I would remove posts from my blog about her and try to have any other reports and complaints that I have filed and posted on various consumer websites and with government agencies removed, and although I was very, very clear with her what I was willing to sign--she continued to send me a Release of Liability/NonDisparagement/Confidentiality Agreement all rolled into one. 

Here's what I understand based on my findings in a legal dictionary, in general conversation "disparage" means to speak poorly about someone, but in a legal context "disparagement" involves a false statement.  My statements about Dr. Griffith have been anything but FALSE.  I have recounted my recollection of what has transpired with our appointment, court dates, and subsequent dealings with Dr. Griffith and I have included my opinion of her based on first hand-knowledge from personal experience.  My opinions, feelings and ideas about Dr. Griffith have been validated by several of her former patients and even well-respected doctors in her field.

For future reference Dr. Julie Griffith - so that you know the next time you try to get a former patient to sign a "Release" in exchange for money, here are the definitions so that you don't get them confused again:

Release of Liability:  A release gives up a right, such as releasing one from his/her liability for harm or damage that may occur or have occurred from performing under a contract, or participating in an activity or service.  The release acts as an assurance to the person requesting the release that they will not be subjected to litigation resulting from the signing party's informed and consensual acts.

Nondisparagement Agreement:  A provision in a contract requiring one or more parties to the agreement not to make negative statements about the other(s).

Confidentiality Agreement: A confidentiality agreement is an agreement between at least two persons that outlines confidential material, knowledge, or information that the parties wish to share for certain purposes. However, when access to the information is to be restricted from a third party a confidentiality clause is added. It is a contract through which the parties agree not to disclose information covered by the agreement.

So I was going to agree to stop initiating any negative comments about Dr. Griffith and I was going to agree to even remove things I have said--not retract--merely remove.  But that was not good enough.  She wanted to silence me and she wanted me to lie (if someone asked me about her or this). So NO.  Signing my rights away to her for a mere $1,000 balance is not worth it to me.  I will continue paying her the balance of the judgment from the NO VALUE consultation, knowing that the medications she prescribed to my son without a comprehensive physical which I believe caused him harm and that her business and billing practices are disturbing and unethical.

I will chalk this up to a learning experience. I will be much more careful trusting people put into positions of power and influence out of pure desperation on my part.

INTEGRITY

Sorry Dr. Griffith, you may have noticed,
but I'm not signing your Agreement.
I'd rather pay you for the bogus consult and keep my integrity.
I have a hard enough time sleeping well at night with an autistic child,
I don't need the weight of selling out on my shoulders.

Dr. Julie Griffith Update - More Fraud

Just when you think "Doctor" Julie Griffith might have actually learned something from this whole fiasco with me stopping payment and going to court and my complaining to anyone who will listen about her, she continues to amaze me with  her lack of integrity and level of corruption.  Either she is more conniving then I have given her credit for or she has poor judgement and no business sense. 

I've had 14 people contact me in various ways, all with similar complaints and issues with Dr. Julie Griffith.  Most issues with her have been regarding her hijacking and extorting money from unsuspecting patients during a serious health crisis. There is definitely a theme to all of the comments, stories and emails I've received and that is that they think there is some serious crazy and unethical medical/business practices going on at that office. Her billing practices are beyond reasonable and now I have just one more personal experience with her to prove what a fraud she is.

I've been making Dr. Griffith monthly payments for the one and only consultation we had with her that I had stopped payment on.  I'm paying her $100 a month on the 20th of each month.  My original bill was about $1600 for the one consult with her.  I stopped payment and with good reason.  We went to small claims court and the judge knocked $500 off the total due to her.  So that's what I'm making payments on, the JUDGEMENT + she is tacking on 10% interest. 

One of her patients emailed me and told me according to Marin County tax records, Dr. Griffith was in default on her HOME/office (since she lives in the same place she sees her patients) property taxes and that it was being sold in foreclosure.  Surprise! I could never figure out why this brilliant Neurologist would even bother with collecting a measly $1600 after what she had done to my son.  At $500 per hour, this doctor must be doing pretty well right??? And what doctor who makes $500 per hour would want to waste their valuable time sitting in Small Claims court?  You have to figure their time is worth something.  But when your patients are dropping you like flies and you have nothing better to do, I guess you fight for what little business revenue you can get; even from someone you knowingly wronged and has opening and legitimately disputed it. How many exceptional and reputable neurologists do you know who are broke and chasing $1600?  Sorry.  I digress.

So I get this "statement" from her office the other day in the mail, letting me know she has "moved her practice".  But what was even more curious about the statement was how inaccurate it was. With Dr. Griffith's track record, I highly doubt this was by any kind of innocent mistake or clerical error. 

First of all she is charging me interest for the last year + that we have been in dispute over this payment; when she can only be billing me for the small claims judgement-yet she's going all the way back to April 2009 and trying to tack on interest from there. 

I also love how she has me classified as being in "collection".  Hmmm.  I did exactly what the court judgement told me to do.  I had so many days to contact her and 1.) either pay her in full or 2.) make a payment agreement with her--which I did within the time frame given.  I contacted her to make payment arrangements, she did not contact me as if to collect.  So as long as I keep my agreement and make my $100 payments per month to her, how am I past due or in collection? It's what SHE AGREED TO.

My favorite discrepancy within the statement is how she has my original balance at $2300+ showing a $975 credit memo.  NONE of her numbers even add up.  What the hell is that all about?  Never, ever was that my amount due to her from our one and only consultation.  She's concocted an arbitrary amount that was never charged or billed or authorized or documented to me and now is acting as if she is giving it back to me in the form of a credit memo????  Uhm, excuse me but I'm thinking that has TAX FRAUD written all over it.  Is she trying to write off this pretend balance as a "bad debt" on her taxes perhaps?  Whatever it is she is trying to pull is totally suspect; just like her "practice".  I called her office and tried to speak with the bookkeeper, but there was a definite language barrier there.  She couldn't understand half of what I was saying.  She tried her best to explain to me that even though Dr. Griffith never actually billed me for the $2300 that she did work on our case and so that's what the charge is there for, but rest assured, I don't have to pay it because it's a credit to me like I should be thanking her for that.

Trying my best to keep my composure, because by now I have more than lost my patience with this "practice" and their shenanigans, I questioned her as to why a Doctor, who was fired for negligence and unethical billing practices, would be working on a file trying to drum up more charges?  I surely never authorized any further work.  Was she trying to come up with a new misdiagnosis to give us?  I know it wasn't from ever actually speaking with Dr. Griffith on the phone because she won't come to the phone for less than $375 per hour and I never ever spoke with her on the phone before.  So, what could she have possibly been working on besides her malpractice defense?  I told the bookkeeper I wanted the statement corrected with the real and actual documented amount that I owed on it and not some random amount that Dr. Julie Griffith pulled out of her ass.  Why not just put $10k or $15k down on my statement???  it wouldn't be any less true than her putting down that I owed her $2300.

I calmly wrote Dr. Griffith another Letter and sent it certified so that she can't say it was never received.  How long can this woman, pretending to be a doctor, actually stay in business like this?  I'm stumped.  What's she going to do for money when I'm done paying her for our one "consultation"? 

I also spoke with HIPPA last week and they are going to continue with investigating my complaint of how she illegally obtained Doodle's records 11 1/2 months after we had been seen (once) in her office as if she was our treating physician and provided them with an invalid request for information.

Dr. Julie Griffith Update


I filed a formal complaint with the Department of Health and Human Services Office for Civil Rights against Dr. Julie Griffith, the most unethical doctor you will ever meet.

Let it go you say? No way.

It's pathetic enough I have to pay her $1260 + court costs for our stupid waste of time consultation. If I had the resources and patience, I would be suing her in court for malpractice from the physical and emotional harm she has caused to the Doodle and to our family.

There is nothing worse than putting your trust and faith in a person of power and esteem to be tricked and mislead for monetary gain at your expense.

I have been in discussion with an attorney and also the UCSF Medicals Records Supervisor because almost 1 year later, after Dr. Griffith clearly had no rights to our medical records she fraudulently obtained them anyway...

I had to wait until UCSF could confirm "how" our records were obtained and under what premise. Besides getting her hands on our records illegally, she purposely tried to cover up the evidence of her acts when we went to small claims court in March. She took white out and "whited out" the top fax information header from UCSF with the date and time and fax number on it and provided a copy to the judge...and the stupid, weird and crazy part was that none of the Doodle's medical records obtained had any bearing on our case. So, as it turns out, this Doctor is not as smart as she looks.

Since our consultation in April 2009 with Dr. Griffith - 7 different people have reached out to me with very disturbing and similar accounts of her unethical medical and billing practices. So, no, I won't let it go. As a mother, I feel it is my duty to do all I can to stop this woman who is falsifying information and diagnosis to pad her pocket book at the expense of innocent children and hopeful parents. She has cold-heartedly and calculatedly chosen "parents of special needs and autistic children" to extort money from.

Here's an excerpt from my complaint to HIPPA:


...During the appeal trial on March 19th, 2010 – Dr. Griffith provided the court and I copies of my son's medical records obtained fraudulently on March 16, 2010 (just 3 days before the court date). Dr. Griffith had NO LEGAL rights to these medical records almost one year later when she was no longer “our doctor”.
Dr. Griffith misrepresented herself to UCSF as a treating physician with respect to obtaining my son’s medical records. She provided to UCSF Medical Records Department the Release of Medical Records form that I signed in good faith on March 31, 2009 before I ever even had a consultation with Dr. Griffith. I never filled in any “dates for medical records” on the Request of Records form which I signed.

Dr. Griffith purposefully and knowingly requested medical records she knew she had no rights to. Proof of this can be gathered because the copies of my son’s medical records provided to the court had the fax information header intentionally “whited – out”. Dr. Griffith accidentally provided me with two copies of the UCSF medical report; one with the fax heading “whited-out” and one with the UCSF fax information visible. This was by no accident because if you compare the two exact UCSF reports together and line them both up together, one UCSF heading is there and the other is not.

It also shows the date and time the fax was faxed to Dr. Griffith and from where and which UCSF fax number. It also shows what time the medical records were printed in the system and by whom (3/15/10 @ 9:11 pm).

This struck me as very odd because I knew that Dr. Griffith was NOT on the distribution list of doctors to receive information, reports and records since we had only had one consultation with her and then she was fired and then she confirmed “dismissal”.

March 22, 2010 – I formally requested any and all documents that were provided to UCSF Medical Records by Dr. Julie Griffith to illegally obtain records on a patient that was not her patient. I was told by UCSF Medical Records that Dr. Griffith provided an old Release of Records signed by ME on March 31, 2009 (11 months, 14 days prior).

It is my opinion, and the opinion of others (including the staffing from the UCSF Medical Records Department), that Dr. Griffith has blatantly misrepresented herself as a Treating Physician in order to illegally obtain my son’s medical records long after being formally dismissed (in writing-certified mail April 27, 2009).

Dr. Griffith has knowingly committed fraud, violated HIPPA regulations and made false statements in a court of law. She has also perjured herself in a court of law.

*FRAUD AND FALSE STATEMENTS
Federal Law, at 18 U.S.C. 1001, authorizes prosecution and penalties of fine or imprisonment for conviction o “whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals or covers up by any trick, scheme or device a material fact, or makes any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement of entry”.

I am hereby requesting a full investigation into Dr. Griffith’s HIPPA violation against my son, Doodle Bug based on:

1. No longer being our Doctor or treating physician and intentionally misrepresenting her as such in order to obtain unauthorized medical records of my son;
2. Purposefully and calculatedly attempting to “cover up” said medical records by altering and using “white-out” on the UCSF fax header on the medical records received containing pertinent information: date, time, source and fax information and then provided to the Court and to me.

Cc: California Medical Board
Marin County Superior Court
Marin County District Attorney Consumer Fraud Division
Institute for Safe Medication Practices
Dr. Julie Griffith


I really hope this was all worth it to Dr. Julie Griffith. The whopping $1260 judgment clouded her common sense and could potentially cost her THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS IN FINES and possible jail time. Justice will be served. Someday. Right?

My Small Claims Court Appeal Ruling...


Two posts in one day? Yes, Virginia, there is a Santa Claus.
Just as I had suspected; ruling for the Plaintiff. (Dr. Julie Griffith, San Rafael, CA)

Just got our ruling in the mail today and the Judge has ordered me to pay the unethical Dr. Julie Griffith, San Rafael, CA the sum of $1260. Not a surprise since he made it really clear this court date wasn't about who lied, misdiagnosed, over prescribed medicine, showed poor ethical behavior, had ridiculous billing practices; was insane, shady, grandiose, mislead patients, money-grubbing, fraudulent, and gave other DAN! Doctors a bad name.

The judge did not include a written reason or decision which kind of bums me out. He said nothing. No explanation at all. He must have seen some dishonesty or delusion in her character because he was nice enough to knock $500 off my bill. Gee. Thanks. I guess he felt like maybe alarming the parent of a two year old unnecessarily and diagnosing her son with a severe brain malformation and then talking about an untrue diagnosis of Dandy Walker for 2 hours might seem a little excessive and calculating; even on the brilliant Dr. Julie Griffith's clock. (insert big court room outburst sigh here)

Will I pay her? Yes. But only because of this terrific legal binding court order to do so. But unfortunately, since all of my money is tied up in change and we have real doctor bills received from real doctors who provide actual medical care instead of taking the patient on a trip to Never-Never Fantasy Land, she is going to have to accept payments in the form of maybe $10 a month for 129 months or so. What's 10 years or so between adversaries?

The only good thing from all of this is that I now have even more ammunition to take this doctor down...with the former patients that have since come forward and because we now have PROOF of Dr. Julie Griffith's misconduct to take to a very different venue so that she can be held accountable for being the FRAUD that she is.

The way this Doctor has behaved will surely raise some eyebrows at the State Medical Board and also at the Federal level.

Still waiting for a silver lining on this one. I guess it has taught me not to be so trusting of someone just because they have a degree on their wall and claim to be a Doctor. Next time I will thoroughly check out a physician before I make an appointment. Next time I will pay better attention to the RED FLAGS such as how many reputable doctors are literally working out of their living room and refusing to bill insurance. Hmmmm.
It's clear that Dr. Julie Griffith, San Rafael, CA is card-carrying member of the Liar's Club...Stay tuned. I'm in this one for the long haul. I will take this as far as I can until I can get some justice.

Squeaky Wheel Gets the Grease

Trumpets Please...
Finally a call from Sutter Hospital in Sacramento.

My old and favorite boss Vance used to say, "Squeaky Wheel Gets the Grease". After jumping through hoops and getting a mandatory referral we were able to beseech the Doodle an appointment with Dr. American at the Sutter Comprehensive Epilepsy Program and Department of Pediatric Neuro Science. Just the name itself sounds so very promising and hopeful.

Driving to Sacramento does not phase me, even with Dominic. I would drive to Canada if it meant getting more information on what is going on in Dommy’s little brain and finding a way to help him. I’m just hoping we don’t come home with more prescriptions…

We have our first appointment on June 30th. I will, of course, be bringing my epilepsy scrapbook with copies of all of the test results, MRI’s , Cat Scans, EEG’s and my lovely Excel color coordinated seizure chart for Dominic. I have been keeping track of all of his seizures and my spreadsheet has gotten quite large and colorful. I love the look on the Doctor’s face when I bust out my scrapbook and seizure chart with the pie graphs. On my chart, I have also carefully made note of when he started a new medication or was taken off a medication and which staggering set of side effects we have since endured (Dommy and Mommy).

On another note, I also just got a letter back from the Medical Board of California in response to my complaint against Dr. Julie Griffith in Marin. Remember, squeaky wheel...They have assigned an Enforcement Analyst to review my allegations. How dare Dr. Giffith take advantage and prey on the vulnerability of a family’s devastating circumstances during a time of such heartache and sorrow. It’s disgusting to witness a medical Doctor use their power and alleged knowledge to frighten and alarm while obtaining gobs of money in exchange for offering a smidgen of hope.

After we very clearly FIRED Dr. Griffith on the phone while screaming at her office manager and with my follow up complaint letter confirming her dismissal (see 4/17/09 blog entry), she wrote me a letter weeks later letting me know that she would no longer be seeing Dominic…and never addressing any of my issues in the letter I had written; which proves just how very crazy she is.

4 Months = 7 Drugs and Counting

I’m at a crossroads, not sure what to believe anymore.

My online Bachelor’s degree in Epilepsy has left me dumbfounded on what is real and what to believe. I am reading as much information as I can to learn more about this but in the process, I am hearing from people who actually have epilepsy and parents of children with epilepsy that the side effects from the medicine is almost worse than the actual seizures.

I’m getting so much contradicting information that people suffering from the disease are self-medicating themselves and weaning themselves off of the multiple drugs that their trusted doctors have put them on because when on more than one anti-seizure drug, they have MORE seizures. I think these people would know since they are living with it every day of their lives—how many doctors out there are actually living with a personal bout with Epilepsy. I can speak from my own experience with the Doodle that this is definitely the case. It seems like the more prescriptions they put him on, the worse he is getting; both cognitively, behavior-wise, motor skills wise and seizure-wise. Apparently, these drugs were tested Stand Alone—they were not ever meant to be combined with other similar drugs. I also keep reading about how some anti-seizure medicines can cause seizures. There is no science to any of this—it all depends on which Doctor you go see and what their opinion is on the various drugs or maybe it’s their favorite.

I keep reading that once you have tried an anti-convulsant and it did not work, the chance of any working after that, no matter how many you try, is about 15%.

I have to ask myself why Dominic has been prescribed 7 different drugs in 4 months by 4 different doctors? I have to ask myself why these doctors cannot agree or come to a consensus on which anti-seizure medicine to use and why in the world they would even think to combine 4 different drugs at once for a 2 year old. Here is our absolutely insane list of Dominic’s medicine without explanation as to WHY they were chosen:

Dr. Jannean: Trileptal, Keppra, Depakote
Dr. Zembal: Phenobarbital
Dr. Griffith: Lamictal and Zonisimide
Dr. Olsen @ Stanford: Chlonazepam


All of these medicines have unbearable, potentially devastating side-effects that have completely changed the Doodle and not for the better. He was already a high strung, high maintenance baby with numerous quirks. He was already fussy and clingy. He was already OCD and ADHD. He already could not focus. Now, these drugs have magnified these behaviors and it’s not even like they are working stopping the seizures.
If I take just one Claritin D for my allergies, it totally changes my sunny disposition. I cannot imagine being on 4 serious medications such as these and I'm a grown woman; not a two year old child who weighs 33 pounds. I feel like I am poisoning my son.
Somebody out there must have answers. I’m anxiously awaiting our appointment at Sutter Neuro-Science in Sacramento with Dr. American (Amar Khan). Surely he will be able to save my baby, right? Or will we come home with another harmful prescription?

We listen to the doctors because they are doctors and know things we don’t know or understand but if I had a brain in my head or testicles between my legs, I would take Dominic off all of these drugs, see what happens and start over.

My Letter to the AMA

To Whom It May Concern:

It is with complete disdain that I am writing this letter to you regarding the blatant misconduct and unethical practices of Dr. Julie Griffith.

I would like this letter to go on record as I am disputing a paid invoice for Dr. Griffith’s alleged services on April 3, 2009 for my two year old son, Dominic based on the following aftermath:

I made an appointment for a consultation with Dr. Griffith for my son who has been diagnosed on the Autism spectrum. Subsequent to his autism diagnosis he began having grand mal seizures in January of this year. It was my understanding that Dr. Griffith would complete a medical examination on Dominic and possibly refer us to various labs for relative testing.

1.) Prior to our consultation appointment on April 3rd in Dr. Griffith’s home office, I had taken the time according to the instruction of the Office Assistant, Laura, to print out and fill out—the 26 pages of questions relating to Dominic’s condition and health history. I did as instructed, which took me hours, and I brought the information with me to our appointment. It was at this time that I saw that she had just raised her hourly rate from $410 to $500 per hour—never did the Office Assistant let me know this when I was making the appointment.

A). During the appointment, Dr. Griffith did not once look at my completed paperwork-she instead asked me the same questions and typed my answers while charging me $500 per hour. 90% of the appointment was her asking me repeated questions from her website that I already answered while I watched her type her notes.

B.) This initial appointment, at my request due to financial hardship, was supposed to be 1 hour. It was confirmed during our consultation that the appointment be one hour and Dr. Griffith instructed her Office Assistant to ring her phone and let her know when one hour was up.

C.) 3 hours later, I was still being charged $500 per hour. I was charged $500 per hour even when Dr. Griffith was not actually examining or consulting with me. I was charged $500 per hour to sit in the living room of her home office while her Office Assistant gathered lab kits and filled out the paperwork for the lab requisitions. My bill came to $1566.67 for her time. Time, which she also used for bathroom breaks.

D.) During the 3 hour office consultation, she only examined Dominic by looking at him for no more than 10 minutes. Never did she check any of his vitals or conduct an actual medical examination as I was told would be completed within the actual consultation.

E.) I would also like to mention that it is the policy of Dr. Griffith’s office to NOT BILL INSURANCE for her service—now a huge red flag for me…

2.) More alarming and disturbing conduct of Dr. Griffith and her staff would be that she sent us away from her office with a very serious possible diagnosis of “Dandy Walker” a potentially life threatening brain malformation. I had brought with us, Dominic’s MRI, CT, and EEG’s—All of which had been reported by Doctors at Memorial Hospital in Santa Rosa, CA as being “normal”. Dr. Griffith looked at the MRI and surmised that Dominic had a possible brain malformation and wanted to get a Third opinion from Stanford. Needless to say, this was very upsetting to me and my family.

When I was able to contact our Neurologist in Santa Rosa, he said Dominic most certainly did not have Dandy Walker…that he did not exhibit any of the other typical signs of Dandy Walker and in so many words described Dr. Griffith as “different” with many unsubstantiated and misleading ideas.

To make matters worse, the following week, Dr. Griffith’s office phoned me to say that they wanted to see Dominic back in the office for $500 per hour so that Dr. Griffith could “re-examine” him because she now felt he had another potentially life threatening brain disorder; but when I asked the office what it was, they would not tell me unless I paid for either a $400 per hour telephone appointment or came into the office for $500 per hour. It has always been my experience with any other Doctor I have ever had that if they wanted to see you—they would first tell you WHY. I could not get this information unless I paid Dr. Griffith more money first.

I expressed my grave concern and disgust for their practices to the Office Assistant. She told me she would pass this along to Dr. Griffith and give me a call back. Later that evening, I received two very startling voicemail messages from Dr. Griffith explaining to me that she now thought Dominic had Mitochondrial Disease. Although, she never once explained what Mitochondrial Disease was—she took the time to tell me it was genetic and that it was probable that my mother and I had passed it down to him. She told me we would need to be counseled and tested and that the testing was very expensive to the tune of $3000. She also told me that my mother and I would have to sign consent forms of some nature, but did not go into any other detail. This message was left for me on the following Friday, April 10th at 5:00 p.m. Now, I had to continue my weekend thinking not only does Dominic have Dandy Walker, but now my mother and I are carriers of a Mitochondrial disease of the Brain. She was nice enough to tell me…”You are welcome to call your other Neurologist, Dr. Jannean, if you have any questions”.

Of course I had questions about this new disease I had never heard of, yet when I phoned her office on the following Monday, April 13th, I was told in order to get answers I would need to make a $400 per hour phone appointment or come in for a $500 per hour.

3.) Finally, the most appalling, unethical and serious conduct of all was that Dr. Griffith prescribed two medications to Dominic for his seizures at our appointment on April 3rd: Lamictal and Zonisimide. She told me not to immediately stop his current medicine: Trileptal and Keppra—she said we had to slowly taper him off of the current medicines giving the new medicines time to “load”. She gave me a very clear and precise schedule on how to increase the dosage of his newly prescribed medicine, but neglected to give me a complete schedule on how to taper him off the existing medicine. In the notes that I was given from her office, it only said:

“4/17/09 Appt and consider taper Trileptal”

“4/23/09 begin taper Trileptal go down ½ tsp beginning in the morning every 5 days until off. Continue taper discussion.”

Never was the Keppra taper mentioned in any of her notes. She had told me at the consultation on April 3rd that “we need to get him off of the Trileptal and Keppra because they could be causing the seizures”.

When she prescribed the new medication, she never told me that the new medicine, Lamictal, that she was prescribing could cause seizures. As a matter of fact, the only two side effects she discussed with me were that one of the new medications could cause a fatal rash and I should watch for that and that one of the medications could make him sleepy.

Once I started Dominic on the additional two medications that Dr. Griffith prescribed, along with the two he was already taking, he showed immediate severe signs of side effects after the first day. He was now having head-drop type seizures and acting very strange. He could not walk two feet without falling down, he stopped making any eye contact, cried constantly as if he had a headache or other type of pain, and was very weak to the point of not being able to walk up or down a stair.

Very alarmed with the side-effects, I called the Office Assistant so that I could talk with Dr. Griffith about Dominic’s adverse reaction to the new medicines. The Office Assistant asked if I would authorize Dr. Griffith to do some “case study” on this subject at $325 per hour. I was totally outraged! I told her absolutely NOT, that this taper schedule of his existing medicine should have been provided to me at the same time she willy-nilly prescribed him the additional two drugs! The Office Assistant told me I should make another appointment and bring Dominic in to the office for $500 per hour so that Dr. Griffith could tell me how to taper the medicine and explain the potentially fatal-genetic Mitochondrial disease to me. At this point I was almost hysterical at the thought of having to pay this Doctor more money to tell me what she should have already told me. This was a serious matter and should have immediately been treated as such. I even put my request for a taper-schedule for the existing medicines into an email to Dr. Griffith so that I could get a simple response in my email without having to pay a $400 per hour phone appointment or come into the office for a $500 per hour appointment. I still have not and have never received a response to my request.

It was during that call that I told the Office Assistant to close out our file, that I would NEVER be bringing Dominic back. I hung up the phone and immediately phoned our other Neurologist, Dr. Jannean, and although he did not prescribe the two additional drugs to Dominic, he was able to tell me how to take him off of them and why. He explained to me that he would have NEVER prescribed those medicines in combination with the two Dominic was already on. He went further to say that the Lamictal can cause head-drop type seizures. These are the kinds of seizures which Dominic had never, ever had until Dr. Griffith prescribed him the Lamictal. Yet, Dr. Griffith refused to come to the phone and discuss them with me for less than $400 per hour.

I thought, once seen by a Doctor in their office, and especially after they have prescribed medicine to a patient, that you are officially a patient of record and the responsibility of that Doctor. How can this Doctor refuse to speak with me when she undertook the treatment and changed his medication without me first paying her more money. This is tantamount to extortion.

Seven hours later I received a voicemail message from Dr. Griffith telling me that I should bring Dominic back into the office so that my insurance might possibly reimburse me. She told me she would give me a 15% discount. Wasn’t that nice? Still, Dr. Griffith has not addressed Dominic’s near overdose of the medicine she prescribed, given me any kind of taper off schedule for the Keppra or answered my questions concerning the potentially terminal and genetic Mitochondrial Disease of the brain.

I think besides Dr. Griffith being a shark only out for money, I think she purposely tried to alarm me with these two possible diagnoses for my baby: Dandy Walker and Mitochondrial Disease –knowing I would be terrified and pay her more money to tell me for sure. Aside from being highly unethical, to me, this conduct borders on criminal fraud.

Regards,
Angela

Cc:
Dr. Julie Griffith
Dr. Jannean
Better Business Bureau
Susan Courteau
BMQA, Board of Medical Quality Assurance
Medical Board of California
Marin County District Attorney’s Office
TACA
Autism Research Institute
http://www.generationrescue.org/

Here's Where You Can Put Your Case Management

What a week it’s been. I feel like I’m coming down off a bad trip of acid and I’ve never even taken acid before. The Doodle Bug continues to have seizures--even loaded up on all this medicine.

At the instruction of our new but now Fired DAN Doctor, we introduced two new medicines into our little two year old’s system. In addition to be doped up on Trileptal and Keppra, which both make him a little crazier than usual, this DAN Doctor prescribed Lamictal and Zonisamide. After just 3 doses, the Doodle could barely stand without falling over and was having a new type of head-drop seizure; where he would just fall over and hit the floor.

Not fond of having to wear his bicycle helmet around the house, he’s even more pissed off now and hard to manage. Pissed off and extremely tired, to the point of narcolepsy.

The lovely $500 an hour idiot DAN Doctor who works out of her home, should have been a red flag to me then…refuses to talk to me about his medicine dosage unless I plunk down $400 per hour for a telephone appointment or as she would recommend, I come into the office—for $500 per hour so that she can answer my questions. These are not random, how ya doin questions, these are serious questions related to the God Damn medicine she just prescribed to him that he can no longer function at all on.

Besides the pure lack of integrity and bedside manner, is this not completely unethical for a MD to prescribe you additional medicine, telling you that you need to slowly taper off the old medicine you are on, but then NEVER provide that information to you unless you come into the office and pay for the rest of the advice?

After ranting to the Office Manager, who suggested in order to get a prescription schedule or my questions answered from said idiot doctor, I should authorize “case management” which is a mere $350 per hour. After telling her where to put her case management and what an outrage this was…I told her we would not be coming back any day soon and to promptly close my file and account. Then, I slammed down my phone as hard as I could in her ear. I never said I was cool, collected and mature. Apparently, this DAN Doctor does not come to the phone for less than $400 per hour.

Since they now know that I am writing one of my letters to the American Medical Association and filing my complaint with the Better Business Bureau and YELP…I get a strange, muddled phone call from the idiot Doctor telling me the good news! She will give me 15% off. Yay. Now I can go to Vegas.